![]() |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ethics Expert: What Michael Jackson and Arthur Andersen Have in CommonJust because a court says the government didn't prove its case doesn't mean you're innocent. Ethics author Shel Horowitz discusses the Michael Jackson and Arthur Andersen cases. Hadley, Mass. (PRWEB) June 17, 2005 -- Being found not guilty is not the same as innocence, says ethics expert Shel Horowitz--and that's something people have to understand as they look at both the Michael Jackson case and the recent Supreme Court decision overturning the guilty verdict against Arthur Andersen. Horowitz, author of the Apex Award-winning book "Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First" and originator of the international Business Ethics Pledge campaign, writes in his Principled Profit blog: "Neither decision addressed the defendant's guilt or innocence. All that has happened is that a jury in one case and a panel of judges in the other found that the government did not make a strong enough case for wrongful intent." Horowitz's hard-hitting blog has previously: -Defended "Newsweek" for running the Koran-abuse story, even after the magazine retracted it
Horowitz writes frequently on the intersection of politics, business, and ethics. The author of six books, he has written for "Business Ethics Magazine "and been quoted in "Inc," "Fortune Small Business," "The Wall Street Journal," and many other business publications. Contact:
### Subscribe to Positive Power of Principled Profit Search Principled Profit
Google allows us to have you search all our sites at once--so don't be surprised if search results bring up other domains. We currently operate nine sites.
Home | Business Ethics Pledge | What Others Say | Preview the Book | Order the Book |
|